|
THE CONSPIRACY THEORY
AND
THE REASON THERE ARE SO MANY COURT CASES
Ques. Why are there are so many court cases?
Answ. Please look at the page on this Website that states "Officials Denying Assistance." There are so many court cases because each office that I went to for assistance stated, "We have been told not to assist you." Thus, this would be a conspiracy. Furthermore, it is my understanding that, "Taxation without Representation is Illegal."
Statement by Media during Ms. Marshall Mayoral Race: Ms. Marshall has sued several officials and has not won a case.
Response:
1) The computers are supposed to randomly select a judge for each case that is filed in federal court, however Ms. Marshall's cases are given to Judge Heyburn or Judge Simpson (this is illegal). Another Judge used on a regular basis for Ms. Marshall' cases - however not as often as Heyburn and Simpson - is Judge Jennifer Coffman.
Note: All three (3) judges were Defendants in a class action lawsuit filed by Plaintiff's Ms. Marshall, Rev. Coleman, Elizabeth Elliott, Rose Perry, Russell Wickliffe, Vicki Page and Pena Cobble (for Daniel Cobble). That case was "Dismissed," due to the fact that we were told not to serve the judges and that the court would serve the judges, and when we did not serve the judges, the court dismissed the case, Case No: 3:06-CV-423-H.
2) There is never any discovery in the cases, and I will list each case to make you aware of the overwhelming amount of evidence filed in each case.
3) Forma Pauperis litigants are illegally denied the right to go forward with their case and the cases are assembly lined and stamped with "frivolous," eventhouugh they have submitted a multitude of evidence, inclusive of a "smoking gun."
4) Sometimes "Orders" are signed by clerks and the Plaintiff is denied the right to know the name of the judge (if any) on the case. (this is illegal).
5) This would mean that there are administrative problems and that the aforementioned judges are not abiding by their Oath of Office, in which numerous Plaintiff/Litigants have filed complaints about these problems and the similar violations and more have occurred in our State, Circuit, District and Family courts in Louisville/Frankfort Kentucky (i.e., denied access to cases that you file, fraudulent information filed in cases and fraudulent court Orders)
*these comments can be confirmed by transcripts of court hearings, court Orders, video and audio tapes, etc.*
"The Media Does Not Report News Regarding the Public Experiencing These Biased Acts,
That Is The Reason You Don't Know About Them"
________________________________________________________________________________________
FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE, I HAVE COLOR CODED THE PENDING COURTS
BLACK - U.S. District Court, Louisville, Ky., GREEN - U.S. Court of Appeals, RED - U.S. Supreme Court
|
I
CASE NO: 3:09-CV-00910-CRS
JUDGE: JUDGE CHARLES R. SIMPSON III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT / WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY / LOUISVILLE
CONNIE MARSHALL
VS
JACK POTTER (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAPACITY)
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
SYNOPSIS: This case is regarding mail being opened, pay checks intercepted, mail intercepted and receipt of fraudulent birth certificate, mail confiscated, paying for registered and restricted delivery mail and not receiving the service, etc. over approximately seven (7) years.
EVIDENCE FILED:
Exhibit 1 - Ten (10) page letter inclusive of log from a master log of corruption mailed to Jack Potter, Postmaster General with the following attachments:
A. Mail Theft/Mail Tampering Questionnaire - Cincinnati Field Office
B. Hand Delivered Letter to Rosemary Miller - Gardiner Lane Location
C. Mail Theft/Vandalism Complaint
D. Mail Theft/Mail Tampering Questionnaire - Pittsburgh Division
E. Letter from Inspector General/Postal Service - Arlington, VA.
Note: A very extensive log with dates times, people I spoke with and other evidence was also submitted with the above listed sent to Jack Potter and filed in this case. (i.e., Robert Mueller - Director - FBI Headquarters - 935 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. - Washington DC 20535 - Mailed by Certified Mail, Retrun Receipt Requested (F.Y.I. - Robert Mueller, of course, is no longer the Director, therefore it would have been given to the current Director, tracking #70081140000028760318).
Exhibit 2 - Copy of Certifed, Restricted Delivery, Return Rceipt Requested Mail Receipt (tracking # 7008-1140-0000-2876-0301) sent to President Barack Obama which was a Quo Warranto, asking for the impeachment of our Dept.of Justice U.S. Attorney General in Louisville, Ky. David Huber (at that time). though, of course, I did not expect President Obama to sign for this item, the return receipt was not completed, the stamp was smeared and I did not have a signature from anyone in the Whitehouse.
Exhibit 3 - I resent the Quo Warranto to President Barack Obama which was asking for the impeachment of our Dept. of Justice U.S. Attorney General in Louisville, Ky, David Huber by Registered, Restricted Delivery, Return Receipt Requested Mail, (tracking #RE-415-905-410-US) though of course, again, I did not expect President Obama to sign for this I received another return receipt that was not completed and does not have a signature from anyone in the Whitehouse.
In addiiton the Complaint sent to Jack Potter, Postmaster General (tracking #7006-2150-0002-8908-1135) was signed for by M. Soos and I have been told by one of the representatives that they do not have an M. Soos working there. I have also been told by John Soos that M. Soos is Martha Soos and she is Assistant to Jack Potter and though I have previously spoken on the telephone to a man stating that he is John Soos, John Soos states that he has never spoken with me, though the voice is the same voice.
Exhibit 4 - "Smeared Mail Receipt." I received regarding a case filed in the United States Court of Federal Claims (Case No: 09-733-C). I received mail from the United Stated Court of Federal Claims appointing a judge on my new case "Opened," and I have saved the envelope, along with several other envelopes that I have received opened.
I also stated in this case that I have numerous other receipts, unsigned and other evidence regarding mail being mishandled and being charged for restricted delivery, certified, registered, express, etc. and not receiving the service that I paid for.
I submitted copies of all exhibits listed above with this case and additional evidence.
JUDGE CHARLES R. SIMPSON III's VERDICT ON THIS CASE:
This case is frivolous. Case Dismissed. Forma Pauperis Denied
Judge Simpson did not allow the Defendants to be served. Case was dismissed without a pretrial or hearing. Case was dismissed without any briefs or any response or defense from defendants.
F.Y.I. - Some of the Other Mail Problems and Other Mail Receipts with smeared return
receipts that would have been filed in this case if allowed to go forward, along with
other evidence are as follows:
1) Certified Packet, sent Restricted Delivery, Return Receipt Requested, sent to Eric Holder, Rm. 4400 Dept. of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC, tracking #7006-2150-0002-8908-1197 - Mailed August 26, 2009. Result: Smeared Stamp, Stamped Signature not ledgible. (I have not received a response from Washington)
2) Certified Packet, sent Return Receipt Requested, sent to Honorable Glen Fine, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Complaints, Office of the Inspector General - U.S. Dept. of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Room 4706, Washington, DC, 20530, tracking #7008-3230-0000-3096-3383 - Mailed June 19, 2009. Result: Smeared Stamp, Stamped Signature not ledgible. (I have not received a response from Washington)
3) I mailed a packet to the Honorable Glen Fine, Registered, Restricted Delivery, Return Receipt Requested Mail, (tracking #RE-454-441-554-US) though of course, again, I did not expect Honorable Glen Fine to sign for this, (I did not receive a response from Washington).
4) I was a Mayoral Candidate in the 2010 in Louisville, Kentucky. I did not receive information mailed to me by Heather at the Kentucky Registry Board of Finance. I called her and she stated that she mailed several days ago. She had to fax it tome because I never received it. I also did not receive some of the invitations and information mailed to me for forums and debates.
5) I have mail/envelopes received opened and was able to get some of the mail delivery people to sign the envelopes, stating that they delivered them opened.
6) I also met with the Downtown Post Office because the mail that I receive is delivered through that office, located on 7th and York Street. I also spoke with the Manager at the Crittenden Drive Post Office location because I usually use that Post Office to mail my letters, packets, etc.
The above listed is just a small example of additional evidence that also includes other express mail and certified receipts that would have been filed in this case, along with the evidence already filed. For the record, to date, I still have problems with my mail.
"I HAVE APPEALED THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS"
CASE NO: 10-5394
(All of the above can be confirmed)
|
___________________________________________________________________________________________
II.
CASE NUMBER: 3:09-CV-680-H,
FILED: SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
JUDGE: JUDGE JOHN G. HEYBURN II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT / WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY / LOUISVILLE
CONNIE MARSHALL
VS
JEFF DEROUEN (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAPACITY)
DAVID L. ARMSTRONG (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAPACITY)
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS
MICHAEL WILNER
BARBARA HUBER
BRIEF SYNOPSIS: This case involves violation of FCC Rules, the Federal Wiretapping Act, United States Constitution, Violation of the False Claims Act, Fraud and Racism.
I also discovered after filing a complaint with Kentucky Public Service Commission regarding Insight Communications that though I signed up for service through "Insight Communications," my telephone service was through "Insight Phone of Kentucky LLC,"and I have never heard of this company.
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED:
Exhibit A - Insight Comunications Log of numerous telephone problems for home telephone number (502) 690-3398.
Exhibit B - Insight Communications Log of numerous telephone problems for home telephone number (502)384-8190.
Exhibit C - Insight Communications Log of numerous problems with internet service for (502) 384-8190.
Exhibit D - Insight Communications - 1/30/09 Disconnect Notice, though my bill was paid.
Exhibit E - Insight Communications bill showing a zero (0) balance owed.
Exhibit F - Insight Communications - 12/15/06 Disconnect Notice.
Exhibits G and H - 2 Cassette tapes of Harassing Communications
Exhibit I - a letter from Marsha Moorman at Human Relations Commission stating that she could not contact me by telephone on 8/22/06. On the log that I submitted to Kentucky Public Service on 8/22/06 I stated that no one could contact me due to the problems with my Insight service. This was also during my time of grief, as my mother passed away on August 22, 2006. Note: there are numerous similar incidents in the log and on the tapes.
I also stated in this case that it is related to the Conspiracy Case that I filed against the Commonwealth, Case Number 3:09-CV-54S (S - stands for Judge Simpson). I also provided proof that every official on every level refuses to assist me and some state that they have been told not to assist me.
I also provided evidence of a Kentucky Public Service Commission Employee refusing to take a complaint in which a witness to the problems with my telephone was providing evidence. Also, one of the (male) Kentucky Public Service Commission employees stated when I ask for assistance, "How do I know that you are not a terrorist?"
I submitted copies of all exhibits listed above with this case and additional evidence.
JUDGE JOHN G. HEYBURN II's VERDICT ON THIS CASE:
This case is frivolous. Case Dismissed. Forma Pauperis Denied
Judge Heyburn did not allow the Defendants to be served. Case was dismissed without a pretrial or hearing. Case was dismissed without any briefs or any response or defense from defendants.
"I HAVE APPEALED THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS"
CASE NO: 10-5462
(All of the above can be confirmed)
|
___________________________________________________________________________________________
III.
CASE NO: 3:09-CV-308-S
JUDGE: JUDGE CHARLES R. SIMPSON III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT / WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY / LOUISVILLE
CONNIE MARSHALL
VS.
DAVID HUBER, U.S. ATTY GENERAL (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAPACITY)
DEPT. OF JUSTICE, U.S. ATTY GENERAL'S OFFICE/KENTUCKY
MR. COX, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, LOUIS., KY (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAP.)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FBI, LOUISVILLE, KY
CHIEF WHITE, LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPT. (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAPACITY)
LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT
JOHN TERRENCE KEELING (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAPACITY) LOUIS. METRO POLICE DEPT
MAJOR YVETTE GENTRY/LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE DEPT. (INDIV./OFFICIAL CAPACITY)
BRIEF SYNOPSIS: This case is regarding Retaliation, Conspiracy, False Claims, Stalking, Torture, Destruction of Property, Intercepting Mail, Intercepting all Communication Devices, Torment, Intimidation, Violation of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Racism, Violation of Oath of Office and Violation of Color of Law, Irreparable Damage to the Plaintiff's, Health (which includes Premedated Murder). This case was also filed due to the Conspiracy against me (Connie Marshall). Also, after filing Case No: 3:09-CV-54-S (Judge Charles R. Simpson III is also the Judge on that case), I continued to be retaliated against, even more severely.
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED:
A. Note put on a statement in my bank account that stated, "Problem with Kentucky Government, Check Federal Government Papers in File before Releasing information to anyone."
B. AT&T Bills and a voicemail message from AT&T that stated, "One of the lines in my office was not mine, they did not know what it was," however AT&T put both lines in my office - and they never worked so I had to close my business - and I was paying AT&T for four (4) months for the lines, which means fraud was committed.
C. Twenty (20) pages taken from my master journal regarding the aforementioned, inclusive of pictures, names, dates and witnesses. The following is an example of some of the entries:
January or February 2009
Police Officer John Terrence Keeling at my door. I did not answer but I called to report him. Two (2) days later my front door lock had to be repaired.
April 21, 2009 - 1:10 p.m.
At 1:10 p.m., having trouble with cell phone, calls not going through. I was riding down 23rd street, which is the street that I live on, when I got down to 23rd and Burwell, I saw a parked police car on the corner of 23rd. I looked in the car and saw John Terrence Keeling. The car number was 5931. I called the police, 911 and I also called Marsha Moorman at Human Relations and told them that I will be filing a stalking charge against him. Note: I have been to the Merit Board regarding him and other corrupt police and nothing is done. As a mattter of fact he has a seat on the Merit Board and they are aware of the crimes he has committed against me, and have evern allowed him to sit on the Merit Board when the complaint that I have filed is against him.
April 26, 2009 - 12:05 p.m. - 12:13 p.m.
Police are bamming on door. I did not answer, but looked out and saw two police cars. One of them was at my door bamming on my door (young, white). Later that day the lock on my front door was broken. I had just replaced the lock as when a previous police officer was at my door in January or February 2009, two days after he left my door I had to replace the lock.
I spoke with someone named Harrod at the 911 number and he stated, "No police officers were dispatched." I spoke with a female (possibly name Madison in Communications) and she did not want to give me the car numbers. I kept asking and finally she stated that they were 224 Baker and 225 David. I kept asking for their names and she stated she was not going to give them to me. I became more persistent and she finally gave me 224 Baker - Simpson and 225 David - Priddy, I asked who was over them and she stated Sargent Laytham. I called and left a message with a female that answered at the 2nd Division and she stated that she would have Sargeant Laytham return my call, however he never did.
They are constantly destroying electrical appliances
(numerous computers, telephones, washer, dryer, tread mill, televisions, cd players, fax machines, car radio etc.)
April 2009 - Destruction of Property
Tape player destroyed while I was making tapes for evidence. The tape player played, but there was no sound. All you could hear was the volume control. I also noticed the heat suddenly was not working. I went to bed and the next morning the house was cold. I tried to turn on the heat, but it would not come on. I smelled gas and called the Fire Department. As I stated, I called the Fire Department and a police officer came (I think his name was Shanklin). I had specifically told the 911 operator not to send a police officer, due to the problems that I have had with them. I had to recall the Fire Department. They stated the electric igniter switch was no longer working. I had to pay a furnace person to repair it. I called Julie Stethen at LG&E (Louisville Gas and Electric Company). (I truly believe that they were trying to arrange an accident, because I could have been killed by the gas smell or an explosion).
D. I submitted evidence regarding Police Officer Danny Lawless who stated in front of a witness and another witness that he did not see that I am "Redlined."
E. I submitted evidence regarding Major Gentry refusing to assist me after confirming that the birth certificate that I received in the mail was fraudulent. Her exact words were, "That's not even a real birth certificate." She then stated, "We're not going to assist you because you have complaints against our officers." I was then told to get off of the property.
F. A Motion for Recusal was filed against Judge Simpson and he denied the motion/refused to Recuse himself.
JUDGE CHARLES R. SIMPSON III's VERDICT ON THIS CASE:
This case is frivolous. Case Dismissed. Forma Pauperis Denied
Judge Simpson did not allow the Defendants to be served. Case was dismissed without a pretrial or hearing. Case was dismissed without any briefs or any response or defense from defendants.
III. (continued)
I APPEALED CASE NO.: 3:09-CV-308-S
THE ASSIGNED APPEALS COURT CASE NO IS:CASE NO: 09-003
JUDGE: "UNKNOWN" I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY ORDERS SIGNED BY A JUDGE
LEONARD GREEN, CLERK, AT THE COURT OF APPEALS IS REFUSING TO GIVE THE NAME OF THE JUDGE (IF ANY) ON THIS CASE.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS / 6TH CIRCUIT / CINCINNATI OHIO
LEONARD GREEN, CLERK, AT THE COURT OF APPEALS SIGNED AN ORDER DENYING FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. HIS REASON WAS THAT THE CASE IS "FRIVOLOUS."
LEONARD GREEN, CLERK, IS NOT A JUDGE AND DOES NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO RULE ON THE MERITS OF A CASE. I HAVE FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST LEONARD GREEN. I HAVE FILED THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS:
A. MOTION TO VACATE THE ORDER SIGNED BY LEONARD GREEN
B. MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF UNKNOWN JUDGE
C. MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF LEONARD GREEN, AS HE IS NOT A JUDGE, HE IS A CLERK
D. MOTION FOR THE NAME OF THE UNKNOWN JUDGE.
RECEIVED ORDER FROM LEONARD GREEN - CASE DISMISSED
LEONARD GREEN DID NOT RESPOND TO A, B, C, AND D MOTIONS ABOVE, AND OTHER MOTIONS ALSO NOT RESPONDED TO.
III. (continued)
I FILED A WRIT OF CERTIORARI WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
RE: 3:09-CV-308-S (District) 09-003 U.S. Court of Appeals
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASE NO IS: 10-5335
PENDING
(All of the above can be confirmed)
___________________________________________________________________________________________
|
IV.
CASE NO: 3:09-CV-61-C
FILED: FEBRUARY 2, 2009
JUDGE: JUDGE JENNIFER COFFMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT / WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY / LOUISVILLE
CONNIE MARSHALL
VS.
JUDGE JERRY BOWLES (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAPACITY)
IRVIN MAZE, JUDGE (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAPACITY)
CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
MARK BIRDWHISTELL (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAP.)
CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
(FOMERLY CABINET FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN)
CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES/CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
(FOMERLY CABINET FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN)
ARTHUR SAMUELS, ATTORNEY
MIKE HARTLAGE (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAPACITY)
CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
(FOMERLY CABINET FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN)
SKY TANGHE (INDIVIDUAL/OFFICIAL CAPACITY)
CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
(FORMERLY CABINET FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN)
MICHAEL TRENT
BRIEF SYNOPSIS: This case is regarding Human Trafficing of Children for Federal funds, Government Waste and Fraud, Pharmaceutical Drug Addicting of Children, Violation of the False Claims Act, Conspiracy, Retaliation, Failure to Assist a Child, Violation of Oath of Office, Violation of Civil Rights, Physical, Emotional and Sexual Abuse of a Child, Violation of Civil Liberties, Production of Fraudulent Documents, Abuse of Power, Defamation Libel and Defamation Slander, Obstruction of Justice, Violation of Color of Law, Conspiracy Against Rights and Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED:
The introduction in this case gives a brief, but thorough synopsis of the history of the original case that Ms. Marshall filed in Family Court, in Louisville Kentucky regarding her grandchildren, Case #01-FC-05084. Ms. Marshall includes the fact that she never went to court, that the children were severely abused in foster care, moved from home to home, etc. Ms. Marshall includes the fact that fraudulent documents were filed in the original case. Ms. Marshall includes the fact that Judge Jerry Bowles had alcohol problems during the time that he was judge on her case. Ms. Marshall includes the fact that the children were illegally placed for adoption and adopted by a Social Worker (Michael Trent), which is also a conflict of interest. Ms. Marshall includes the fact that Michael Trent (I'm assuming because he thought the child would remember), told her that he got into the shower with one of the children when they came to his home, and that the child was uncomfortable. Ms. Marshall included the fact that the computer she gave the children in 2006 was placed in Michael Trents's bedroom. Ms. Marshall includes the fact that her grandchildren were being abused in the home of the adopted parent, Michael Trent, and that one of the children was continuously running away, and Michael Trent placed that child in a boot camp. Ms. Marshall included the fact that another foster child placed in the home of Michael Trent also ran away. Ms. Marshall gives details, dates, witnesses, etc.
Other info. filed in this Case
Exhibit A - Article 2007, "Kentucky Foster Care Rife with Corruption," News Report by wlwt Cincinnati, Note: there is also a short paragraph regarding my grandchildren and I.
Exhibit B - Article 2007, "Inspector Delivers Scathing Child Services Report," News Report by wlky.com, Note: The Inspector General was Robert Benvenuti III.
Exhibit C - Article 2006, "Kentucky Unjustly Terminates Parental Rights For Federal Money," by Valarie Honeycutt Spears."
Attachment - Certifiled Letter to Governor Stever Beshear - Mail Tracking # 7008-3230-0000-3095-7856 - regarding a visit made to his office by myself and two other ladies. I showed Mike Alexander, Assistant Attorney in Gov. Steve Beshear's Office samples of the numerous drugs being given to my grandchildren and one of the ladies and I talked about the abuse of children in the Kentucky Foster Care System.
Other Evidence Submitted Includes the Illegal Dosages of Medication given to "All" Children in the home of the Adopted Parent (one example is as follows).
One of The Children's Daily Dosage of Pills (in approximately 2008)
Amphetamine Salts - 5 mg tablet - 1 tablet by mouth once daily at noon - 1 pill
Risperdol - 1 mg. tablet - 1 by mouth 2 times per day - 2 pills
Depakote - 250 mg. - 1 by mouth every morning and 2 at bedtime - 3 pills
Adderall XR - 20 mg. tablet - 1 tablet by mouth each day - 2 pills
Topomax - 25 mg. tablet - 1 tablet by mouth each day - 1 pill
____________________________________________________________
TOTAL PILLS TAKEN PER DAY = (NINE) 9 PILLS
Note: The Actress Anna Nicole Smith was taking Topomax and she is deceased. Other drugs given to children include Lithium Carbonate, Trileptal, Paxil, Trilitheum, etc.
Another Child's Daily Dosage of Pills (in approximately 2008)
Lithium Carbonate - 300 mg tablet - 1 tablet by mouth every morning and 2 by mouth every evening - 3 pills
Risperdol - 2 mg. tablet - 1 by mouth 2 times per day - 2 pills
Concerta - 18 mg. tablet - 1 by mouth every morning - 1 pills
Topomax - 100 mg. tablet - 1 by mouth 2 times each day - 2 pill
____________________________________________________________
TOTAL PILLS TAKEN PER DAY = (EIGHT) 8 PILLS
SOME OF THE MOTIONS FILED IN THIS CASE:
A) Motion for Protective Order and Emergency Custody - Filed March 25, 2009 - Response was due April 13, 2009.
(All of the above can be confirmed)
III.
I APPEALED CASE NO.: 3:09-CV-61-C
THE ASSIGNED APPEALS COURT CASE NO IS:CASE NO: 09-5999
JUDGE: "UNKNOWN" I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY ORDERS SIGNED BY A JUDGE
LEONARD GREEN, CLERK, AT THE COURT OF APPEALS IS REFUSING TO GIVE THE NAME OF THE JUDGE (IF ANY) ON THIS CASE.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS / 6TH CIRCUIT / CINCINNATI OHIO
LEONARD GREEN, CLERK, AT THE COURT OF APPEALS SIGNED AN ORDER DENYING FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. HIS REASON WAS THAT THE CASE IS "FRIVOLOUS."
LEONARD GREEN, CLERK, IS NOT A JUDGE AND DOES NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO RULE ON THE MERITS OF A CASE. I HAVE FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST LEONARD GREEN. I HAVE FILED THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS:
A. MOTION TO VACATE THE ORDER SIGNED BY LEONARD GREEN
B. MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF UNKNOWN JUDGE
C. MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF LEONARD GREEN, AS HE IS NOT A JUDGE, HE IS A CLERK
D. MOTION FOR THE NAME OF THE UNKNOWN JUDGE.
RECEIVED ORDER FROM LEONARD GREEN - JUNE 10, 2010 - CASE DISMISSED - PROPER FEE NOT PAID
(FYI - I qualify for Forma Pauperis, as I am receiving unemployment, and as you can see, the case is not frivolous, and Leonard Green is not a Judge and can not rule on the merits of a case)
LEONARD GREEN DID NOT RESPOND TO A, B, C, AND D MOTIONS ABOVE, AND OTHER MOTIONS ALSO NOT RESPONDED TO.
I PLAN TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST LEONARD GREEN. I HAVE ALSO ORDERED A "WRIT OF CERTIORARI" PACKET FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND PLAN TO APPEAL THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
__________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
*MORE CASES COMING SOON, YOU NEED TO KNOW WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON*
|
|